Can it run @ 1080p w/ stable 30FPS

[shreduhsoreus]

(12-25-2014, 01:55 PM)shawking Wrote: Also, Mini ITX LGA 1150 boards are expensive, so the entire thing is really out of my budget.

Isn't that exactly what you already have picked out, or am I missing something here?

[shawking]

(12-25-2014, 04:57 PM)shreduhsoreus Wrote:

(12-25-2014, 01:55 PM)shawking Wrote: Also, Mini ITX LGA 1150 boards are expensive, so the entire thing is really out of my budget.

Isn't that exactly what you already have picked out, or am I missing something here?

Oh crap, you're completely right. Noob mistake lol.

Well, I guess I can upgrade to the G3258 and then maybe when I get more cash later on I'll get an aftermarket cooler to OC.

[shreduhsoreus]

(12-25-2014, 11:09 PM)shawking Wrote: Oh crap, you're completely right. Noob mistake lol.

Well, I guess I can upgrade to the G3258 and then maybe when I get more cash later on I'll get an aftermarket cooler to OC.

Happens to the best of us


I would, it's only $15 more and it would be a better option.

[admin89]

Quote:I'll get an aftermarket cooler to OC.

Most people overclock G3258 on Intel stock cooler . 3.2->4.4->4.6GHz stable without aftermarket cooler

[tential]

(12-25-2014, 11:09 PM)shawking Wrote:

(12-25-2014, 04:57 PM)shreduhsoreus Wrote:

(12-25-2014, 01:55 PM)shawking Wrote: Also, Mini ITX LGA 1150 boards are expensive, so the entire thing is really out of my budget.

Isn't that exactly what you already have picked out, or am I missing something here?

Oh crap, you're completely right. Noob mistake lol.

Well, I guess I can upgrade to the G3258 and then maybe when I get more cash later on I'll get an aftermarket cooler to OC.

Happy to have caught that one for you.  Considering that processor is a gift from Intel to the enthusiast community, it'd be a waste not to capitalize on it's OC ability.  There won't be future low end processors with OC capability and Intel did us one further and allowed the processor to be OC'd on cheap boards (Normally this is reserved for premium Z series boards).  I'd still check and ensure your board can OC this processor though or find one that is verified to do so (that is still cheap).  

[shawking]

(12-26-2014, 05:00 AM)admin89 Wrote:

Quote:I'll get an aftermarket cooler to OC.

Most people overclock G3258 on Intel stock cooler . 3.2->4.4->4.6GHz stable without aftermarket cooler

Yes, but how are the temperatures? Intel stock coolers are rather crappy so I think I'll wait a few extra weeks to get a decent $30 cooler. 

(12-26-2014, 08:41 AM)tential Wrote:

(12-25-2014, 11:09 PM)shawking Wrote:

(12-25-2014, 04:57 PM)shreduhsoreus Wrote:

(12-25-2014, 01:55 PM)shawking Wrote: Also, Mini ITX LGA 1150 boards are expensive, so the entire thing is really out of my budget.

Isn't that exactly what you already have picked out, or am I missing something here?

Oh crap, you're completely right. Noob mistake lol.

Well, I guess I can upgrade to the G3258 and then maybe when I get more cash later on I'll get an aftermarket cooler to OC.

Happy to have caught that one for you.  Considering that processor is a gift from Intel to the enthusiast community, it'd be a waste not to capitalize on it's OC ability.  There won't be future low end processors with OC capability and Intel did us one further and allowed the processor to be OC'd on cheap boards (Normally this is reserved for premium Z series boards).  I'd still check and ensure your board can OC this processor though or find one that is verified to do so (that is still cheap).  

I'll double check the motherboard and it's overclocking functionality. Even if I only hit 4000 MHz, I will still gain a good increase in performance.

[AnyOldName3]

The Intel stock cooler is designed to dissipate the 88 Watts of Intel's top consumer CPUs at stock clocks. The G3258 starts much lower than this in terms of power output (53W), but comes with the same cooler. Even at 4.5+ GHz, it's still not putting out 80W of heat, so the cooler's well within specification and can handle it.

[shawking]

(12-26-2014, 12:16 PM)AnyOldName3 Wrote: The Intel stock cooler is designed to dissipate the 88 Watts of Intel's top consumer CPUs at stock clocks. The G3258 starts much lower than this in terms of power output (53W), but comes with the same cooler. Even at 4.5+ GHz, it's still not putting out 80W of heat, so the cooler's well within specification and can handle it.

I guess I'll go for it since many users hit 4.2Ghz+ on stock while staying under 65C... I've always been told that the anniversary pentium doesn't use the same cooler as the i5s/7s though. Hmm.