There are probably plenty of additional erroneous reports. I also see two G4600's, one at 334 and another at 411; night and day. Now I really have no clue what to expect from a Skylake or later Intel CPU running in the vicinity of 3.5GHz.
If I sort the list by CPU clock and look at all the Intel processors from 7th gen and newer between 3.4 and 3.6GHz, the scores run the gamut between 329 and 421, with the former being 28% faster than the latter. That is probably an unrealistic range. The best scores of 329 and 341 are held by a G4560 (3.5GHz) and a G4600 (3.6GHz), respectively, which may well be in error, while suspiciously, the two worst scores of 421 and 411 also belong to a G4500 (3.5GHz) and a G4600 (3.6GHz). It's a head-scratcher.
I'll have to assume that the real capability of those processors at 3.5GHz is in the vicinity of 390 points.
What do you think?
I'm not too hung up on it. In the end I'll just get the best I am willing to pay for but this is fun to ponder about.
If I sort the list by CPU clock and look at all the Intel processors from 7th gen and newer between 3.4 and 3.6GHz, the scores run the gamut between 329 and 421, with the former being 28% faster than the latter. That is probably an unrealistic range. The best scores of 329 and 341 are held by a G4560 (3.5GHz) and a G4600 (3.6GHz), respectively, which may well be in error, while suspiciously, the two worst scores of 421 and 411 also belong to a G4500 (3.5GHz) and a G4600 (3.6GHz). It's a head-scratcher.
I'll have to assume that the real capability of those processors at 3.5GHz is in the vicinity of 390 points.
What do you think?
I'm not too hung up on it. In the end I'll just get the best I am willing to pay for but this is fun to ponder about.
Windows 10 Pro x64 | i7-9700K @ 4.6-5.0GHz | MSI Z370 Gaming Plus | MSI RX 5700 8GB Factory-OC | 16 GB DDR4-3000