Firefox uses your GPU too, and even in a more effencient way
And you can also install it on XP (Which is pretty old, but however)
And you can also install it on XP (Which is pretty old, but however)
Can 7670 be this bad?
|
07-09-2011, 05:44 AM
Firefox uses your GPU too, and even in a more effencient way
And you can also install it on XP (Which is pretty old, but however) 07-09-2011, 05:49 AM
(07-09-2011, 05:27 AM)Gabriel Belmont Wrote:(07-09-2011, 05:20 AM)Amarganth Wrote: Yes, I've tried dx9, absolutely no difference at all! Ok my friend thanks for the fast reply my Dolphin Graphical Specs are in the attachment Below. My PC Specs: System: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit -Service Pack 1 BIOS: Default Gygabyte System BIOS Processor: AMD Phenomâ„¢ II X6 1090T Processor 3.20 GHz Memory (RAM): 8 GB Graphic Card: Sapphire Radeon HD 6870 Dolphin Emulator: Official 3.0 Build (07-09-2011, 05:44 AM)Anti-Ultimate Wrote: Firefox uses your GPU too, and even in a more effencient way Who on earth still uses xp? Firefox doesn't use your GPU in the same way IE9 does, hence why Fraps shows frames per second on every IE9 window but doesn't show on any Firefox window. But I digress... The new Dolphin SUCKS!!! 07-09-2011, 05:46 PM
(07-09-2011, 08:21 AM)johny5mpellos Wrote: Well can anyone help me with my problem?? Well I like to start trying something here with your settings: Aspect Ratio: chose Force 4:3 Untick Render to Main Window Internal Resolution set that to 1x and along with Anti-Aliasing & Anisotropic Filtering set the to their minimum Untick Force Texture Filtering Untick Skip EFB Access to CPU EFB Copies to RAM should be chosen instead of Texture Disable External Frame Buffer Untick Disable Fog along with OpenCL Texture Decoder & OpenMP Texture Decoder Aside from the Fullscreen resolution this resembles the settings I have selected. Try it out at least. 07-09-2011, 06:55 PM
Ok, how on earth is this possible? So I've tried the new 7671 revision. No matter WHAT I do the fps stays at 15 - 20. No matter what internal resolution, be it 1x or 4x, no matter if anistropic filtering is 1x or 16x, no matter the hacks (yes I've tried to tick and untick EVERYTHING!), no matter if I use dx9, dx11 or opengl. The only thing that makes any difference at all is ticking per-pixel lighting, force texture filtering and AA on dx9, but they slow the emulation down and are unticked by default.
how? 07-09-2011, 07:07 PM
(07-09-2011, 06:55 PM)Amarganth Wrote: Ok, how on earth is this possible? So I've tried the new 7671 revision. No matter WHAT I do the fps stays at 15 - 20. No matter what internal resolution, be it 1x or 4x, no matter if anistropic filtering is 1x or 16x, no matter the hacks (yes I've tried to tick and untick EVERYTHING!), no matter if I use dx9, dx11 or opengl. The only thing that makes any difference at all is ticking per-pixel lighting, force texture filtering and AA on dx9, but they slow the emulation down and are unticked by default. Maybe not adapted to your system... what about 3.0? and older ones?
[color=#ff0000][color=#006600]i5 3570K @ 4.5GHz/GTX 660 Ti/RAM 4GB/Win7 x64[/color][/color]
07-09-2011, 07:10 PM
(07-09-2011, 07:07 PM)LordVador Wrote:(07-09-2011, 06:55 PM)Amarganth Wrote: Ok, how on earth is this possible? So I've tried the new 7671 revision. No matter WHAT I do the fps stays at 15 - 20. No matter what internal resolution, be it 1x or 4x, no matter if anistropic filtering is 1x or 16x, no matter the hacks (yes I've tried to tick and untick EVERYTHING!), no matter if I use dx9, dx11 or opengl. The only thing that makes any difference at all is ticking per-pixel lighting, force texture filtering and AA on dx9, but they slow the emulation down and are unticked by default. I've tried 3.0 as already stated, same deal. Before trying out a new revision I've used an old one (perhaps a month old or something) which functioned properly and I had 40 to 60 fps in every game. But I can't for the love of god remember which revision it was...besides, a new revision ought to improve things not make them worse than they ever were. 07-09-2011, 07:11 PM
(07-09-2011, 05:49 AM)Amarganth Wrote:(07-09-2011, 05:44 AM)Anti-Ultimate Wrote: Firefox uses your GPU too, and even in a more effencient way I don't use XP, i just tested it on Virtual XP Mode Well, FRAPS also shows on Firefox (Top right, where the Firefox Button is) It's blue for no reason 07-09-2011, 07:18 PM
(07-09-2011, 07:11 PM)Anti-Ultimate Wrote: I don't use XP, i just tested it on Virtual XP Mode Soz, I see no fraps on firefox. On topic: anyone got any explanation for my problem or do the new revisions simply suck bad? |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|