Poll: Who do you think will be faster? You do not have permission to vote in this poll. |
|||
Sandybridge | 32 | 82.05% | |
Bulldozer | 5 | 12.82% | |
Same | 2 | 5.13% | |
Total | 39 vote(s) | 100% |
* You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
Bulldozer vs. Sandybridge
|
07-12-2011, 11:35 PM
07-12-2011, 11:48 PM
oh no its an 8core cpu...
running against a intel sandybridge 4 core cpu... come on dude... dont fuck with intel
EDIT by neobrain: that pic was kinda annoying..
EDIT by dannzen: don't fuck with my sig EDIT by neobrain: yet, I will keep doing it EDIT by ???? : A WILD DACO APPEARS EDIT by [SS]: Hey guys, what's going on here? EDIT by dannzen: Gotta Catch 'em All! EDIT by ???? : WILD DACO BROKE FREE FROM MASTER BALL 07-13-2011, 12:22 AM
Quote:it appears Bulldozer sits somewhere between a Sandy Bridge Core i7 2600K and Gulftown Core i7 990X 4.2GHz on 4 cores seems very interesting, but one thing i've learnt on this forum is that the architecture sometimes matters more than the clock speed. besides, doesn't AMD normally make less powerful but more cost effective processors? 07-13-2011, 01:12 AM
My Sandy Bridge kicks that AMD butt...err I mean Bulldozer any day.
And so will the Ivy Bridge. AMD will just have to accept to be 2nd, and we all know there's no points for second best....right. 07-13-2011, 01:56 AM
(07-13-2011, 12:03 AM)Anti-Ultimate Wrote: I'll beat that next year on my Ivy Bridge You're cheating...
[color=#ff0000][color=#006600]i5 3570K @ 4.5GHz/GTX 660 Ti/RAM 4GB/Win7 x64[/color][/color]
07-13-2011, 02:52 AM
07-13-2011, 05:29 AM
Ahem,
NOTE- The leaked cpu is an ES sample, this does not mean that this is the final performance of the Bulldozer platform. If you look closely at Bulldozer, it's more or less 4-6 physical cores if you compare it to other x86/64 cpus, but has 8 spus. Also, the 2600k is multhreaded, so 8 threads together, and the 990x has 12 threads. The big advantage to Bulldozer that has been for AMD for several months around time of Phenom II release, Bulldozer is expected to be at the most around $250-$300 for the high end chip, where as the 990x is still $999 retail, and the 2600k is what, $350 or so? Quote:4.2GHz on 4 cores seems very interesting, but one thing i've learnt on this forum is that the architecture sometimes matters more than the clock speed. besides, doesn't AMD normally make less powerful but more cost effective processors?It depends on how efficient the cpu is. Pentium 4 had clocked speeds up to 3.8 ghz stock, and could be overclocked 5ghz+, but then even compared to the Athlon 64's that were clocked around 2.4-2.6 ghz max stock the Athlons killed Pentium 4, even with the first generation hyperthread. 07-13-2011, 07:15 AM
Great work AMD, I wonder what would be the benefits from the merge with ATI. This battle is just about to begin.
Rig *Corei5 3570K *Nvidia 9800GT 1GB DDR3 *Motherboard Asus P8H77M-PRO *Win7 x64 *RAM 8GB DDR3(1600) 07-13-2011, 10:59 AM
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)