Broken Stereoscopic 3D since 4.0-7924

[mbc07]

(12-08-2015, 02:47 AM)eckso Wrote: Now you dispel "warnings" to people with opposing ideas? I write because I can, if you don't like do not reply or censor.

Just FYI, it wasn't me who issued the warning. Also, warnings are not issued for no reason or to "censor" people, if you got a warning you did something to receive it, so, watch your manners.

(12-08-2015, 02:47 AM)eckso Wrote: ...and the proof is how two "content creators" (whatever that tells about a random guy/gal) chime in to do nothing else than say "I am right you are wrong", like little kids.

Nobody said "I am right, you're wrong". If that's all you could get off our previous replies, it's not our problem, go re-read them.

(12-08-2015, 02:47 AM)eckso Wrote: If you can't see past through that and reason why regressions shouldn't be reverted ASAP as it's been constantly done, or even have a glance at the AA issues, maybe is because you are straight out-of-focus, and won't find dialogue with me.

The number of reverts got hugely decreased after Dolphin moved to GitHub with its Pull Request system. Generally, if something slips out of PR testing, an issue is opened and it remains open until someone submits a new PR with a fix. You already opened the issue so all you can do now is wait (or as I said, if you have coding skills you can try to fix it yourself and then submit a new PR -- it's a community-driven project after all). Things are reverted ASAP only in case of issues considered critical by the developers or problems that affects a huge part of the user base, and  we can safely say that stereoscopy doesn't fit in any of those "high priority" categories (to the extent it remained broken for years and even then nobody complained before getting to the state it's now).

(12-08-2015, 02:47 AM)eckso Wrote: I could and I won't. Not impatient, just baffled.

You made your choice. Just wait then.