(12-07-2015, 01:30 AM)eckso Wrote: ... the commit should had never been accepted to start with, because it was a chunk of flawed code that a random one-day developer threw there for self needs.
The difference is that this "random one-day developer" actually implemented a new feature that some users were requesting. And you're the random guy demanding the feature to be reverted just because the regression you discovered wasn't fixed as soon as you reported it. So, between two random guys I would still pick the one who coded a new feature in the emulator instead of the one that is just complaining and demanding things to be resolved as if he owned the emulator
BTW, Dolphin is open-source, you can freely fork the emulator and compile your own build with this change reverted if you're too impatient to wait for a fix, or better yet, you could fix the issue yourself and then submit a new PR for review.
Avell A70 MOB: Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060, 16 GB DDR4-3200, Windows 11 (Insider Preview)
ASRock Z97M OC Formula: Pentium G3258, GeForce GT 440, 16 GB DDR3-1600, Windows 10 (22H2)
ASRock Z97M OC Formula: Pentium G3258, GeForce GT 440, 16 GB DDR3-1600, Windows 10 (22H2)