• Login
  • Register
  • Dolphin Forums
  • Home
  • FAQ
  • Download
  • Wiki
  • Code


Dolphin, the GameCube and Wii emulator - Forums › Dolphin Emulator Discussion and Support › General Discussion v
« Previous 1 ... 281 282 283 284 285 ... 368 Next »

Bring 2x25 SSAA back !
View New Posts | View Today's Posts

Pages (7): « Previous 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7
Jump to page 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Thread Modes
Bring 2x25 SSAA back !
10-30-2010, 09:09 AM
#61
NaturalViolence Offline
It's not that I hate people, I just hate stupid people
*******
Posts: 9,013
Threads: 24
Joined: Oct 2009
Quote:Radeons eat dirt when using SSAA

I'de like to see you prove that. They both have the same performance hit. 1/n where n is the number of samples since all you are doing is raising the internal resolution.

Let's make p = pixel fillrate, r = resolution per frame, f = framerate, n = number of samples.

Normally:

p/r = f

with ssaa it should therefore be:

p/(r x n) = f

Of course this is just for the max framerate that the gpu is capable of. You also have to factor in external bottlenecks. Since supersampling increases EVERYTHING equally it is impossible to design a gpu that has a different performance hit than another. You are probably thinking of msaa. Since radeon gpus used to have terrible msaa performance due to crappy rops.
"Normally if given a choice between doing something and nothing, I’d choose to do nothing. But I would do something if it helps someone else do nothing. I’d work all night if it meant nothing got done."  
-Ron Swanson

"I shall be a good politician, even if it kills me. Or if it kills anyone else for that matter. "
-Mark Antony
Website Find
Reply
10-31-2010, 01:28 AM
#62
Squall Leonhart Offline
Friend of local jackass
*******
Posts: 1,177
Threads: 27
Joined: Apr 2009
(10-30-2010, 09:09 AM)NaturalViolence Wrote:
Quote:Radeons eat dirt when using SSAA

I'de like to see you prove that. They both have the same performance hit. 1/n where n is the number of samples since all you are doing is raising the internal resolution.

Let's make p = pixel fillrate, r = resolution per frame, f = framerate, n = number of samples.

Normally:

p/r = f

with ssaa it should therefore be:

p/(r x n) = f

Of course this is just for the max framerate that the gpu is capable of. You also have to factor in external bottlenecks. Since supersampling increases EVERYTHING equally it is impossible to design a gpu that has a different performance hit than another. You are probably thinking of msaa. Since radeon gpus used to have terrible msaa performance due to crappy rops.

http://www.ngohq.com/news/18364-epic-fail-ati-supersampling-performance.html
[Image: squall_sig2.gif]
[Image: squall4rinoa.png]
VBA-M
Website Find
Reply
10-31-2010, 04:03 AM
#63
NaturalViolence Offline
It's not that I hate people, I just hate stupid people
*******
Posts: 9,013
Threads: 24
Joined: Oct 2009
Alright that proves absolutely nothing.....

All that proves is that SSAA can kill performance if your card isn't powerful enough....which is true for both brands. If you want to make the claim that ati cards are somehow not as good at handling SSAA than equivalent nvidia cards then you need to find benchmarks using SSAA that pit equivalent cards from the two brands against each other. MODERN CARDS
"Normally if given a choice between doing something and nothing, I’d choose to do nothing. But I would do something if it helps someone else do nothing. I’d work all night if it meant nothing got done."  
-Ron Swanson

"I shall be a good politician, even if it kills me. Or if it kills anyone else for that matter. "
-Mark Antony
Website Find
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Pages (7): « Previous 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7
Jump to page 


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread
Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB | Theme by Fragma

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode