4200Mhz e6300 vs 3915Mhz e8400

[handlebike]

Hello. As the title says, which would provide better performance with Dolphin? An e6300 clocked at 4200Mhz or an e8400 at 3915Mhz. I own both processors so it's not a matter of buying anything extra (just a small time investment to swap it out and overclock).

[georaldc]

Well spec wise, the e8400 is much better than the e6300 but I'm not sure if the emulator takes advantage of that (I'm guessing it does). Did you hit a wall getting your e8400 to clock higher? It should be able to hit 4ghz I believe

[boogerlad]

[handlebike]

(11-21-2011, 08:22 AM)georaldc Wrote: Did you hit a wall getting your e8400 to clock higher?

Yeah, the highest I can push my p43 motherboard is a 1740 FSB so no 4Ghz for me.

(11-21-2011, 08:41 AM)boogerlad Wrote:

Thanks for the reply, but this is the "Pentium Dual Core" (Wolfdale) e6300 that I own, not the Conroe by the same name.

[boogerlad]

sorry I was misinformed. not exactly e6300 cache, but close enough?

[Diddy Kong]

It astounds me that people willingly subscribe to the idea that anything presented on a neat, cogently designed chart is empirical :p
I don't have answers here, I'm just extrapolating an allusion

[handlebike]

Still hard to tell without knowing how dolphin will behave with the difference in L2 cache.

Seems like it could be anywhere from a ~7% performance gain to a ~11% performance loss.

[tuanming]

I'd pick the E8400 simply because of the 6MB cache and it also have a higher FSB. On the other hand, the E6300 only have 2MB with 1066MHz fsb.

[NaturalViolence]

e8400 @ 3.915GHz no question about it. Dolphin will gain a substantial improvement from the 6MB cache (probably around 15-20%) and you will get a memory bottleneck at around 3.8GHz with either cpu so anything past that is effectively pointless.