Starting with 4.0-5319, Dolphin took a serious performance hit - up to 25% slower (with both backends, EFB2RAM and EFB2Tex):
nsmb cake intro:
-----------------------
74fps -> 56fps (D3D, EFB2RAM @ 1xIR)
60fps -> 47fps (D3D, EFB2RAM @ 6xIR)
60fps -> 45fps (OGL, EFB2RAM @ 6xIR)
95fps -> 72fps (D3D, EFB2Tex @ 6xIR)
This is the dev. build and PR / commit which caused the regression:
4.0-5319:
PostProcessing: Add support for user-supplied anaglyph shaders. (PR #1817)
The previous build (4.0-5315) doesn't have this problem.
-----------------------
Testing needed !
-----------------------
* Use the config files below (see attachment) in portable mode <-- see the section "for advanced users only"
* Run the the nsmb cake intro with builds 4.0-5315 and 4.0-5319 and compare the frame rate.
It would be great if any of these users (listed below based on their hardware specs) could perform a regression test :
* cammelspit
* Echoes
* ExtremeDude2
* GeneralFailer
* kinkin ?
* Nfaug
* omega_rugal
* slarlac249
* Stevoisiak
* sulblazer
* Tino ?
nsmb cake intro:
-----------------------
74fps -> 56fps (D3D, EFB2RAM @ 1xIR)
60fps -> 47fps (D3D, EFB2RAM @ 6xIR)
60fps -> 45fps (OGL, EFB2RAM @ 6xIR)
95fps -> 72fps (D3D, EFB2Tex @ 6xIR)
This is the dev. build and PR / commit which caused the regression:
4.0-5319:
PostProcessing: Add support for user-supplied anaglyph shaders. (PR #1817)
The previous build (4.0-5315) doesn't have this problem.
-----------------------
Testing needed !
-----------------------
* Use the config files below (see attachment) in portable mode <-- see the section "for advanced users only"
* Run the the nsmb cake intro with builds 4.0-5315 and 4.0-5319 and compare the frame rate.
It would be great if any of these users (listed below based on their hardware specs) could perform a regression test :
* cammelspit
* Echoes
* ExtremeDude2
* GeneralFailer
* kinkin ?
* Nfaug
* omega_rugal
* slarlac249
* Stevoisiak
* sulblazer
* Tino ?